Monday, August 31, 2009

Gay Clip In Religulous

Barça - Real Madrid: A model of country


sure more than a wonder the relationship between two football clubs and a country, our country. Perhaps my reasoning a bit simplistic, but as it goes.

All my friends know I am a lifelong asshole and proud. And that implies a certain amount of anti-Real Madrid. In this note, this is not the case, as relevant here is the comparison of two management: talent trained at home and home versus buying indiscriminately.

begin by the second and a question: apart from isolated successes, can maintain over time an organization that depends only on values \u200b\u200bacquired at the point of checkbook without deep identification with the club (the country)? Having seen, the answer is obvious. Real have been great when your project has been based more on the national product in procurement. Now, if the project is selling T-shirts and sporting success (development project) is added, well, there are no comparison. Today, while having a large pool (youth of the country) prefer to buy the development of it, denying it the opportunity to grow and succeed at home (the country) and has only become currency (brain drain) to purchase that may or may not give success.

Barca, for many years, has a game model, style (national project), based primarily on talent homemade (youth). The boys who come to the farmhouse they were pampered, given formal education opportunities, are encouraged to continue to grow and develop, not only as players (professionals), but also as human beings. Come the time, the most talented and workers come to the first team (merits): with varying degrees of success (in life nothing is guaranteed) work to achieve metas, basados en el talento propio y en un diseño establecido pero no rígido: éste varía más o menos según las circunstancias (adaptación al medio).

En los últimos doce meses hemos visto cómo ese sistema ha dado unos frutos que, para muchos, eran impensables. Los jugadores hechos en casa, junto a las adquisiciones que eran necesarias para cubrir las carencias (importación de insumos no producidos en el país) han logrado éxitos sin precedentes: cinco títulos (proyectos exitosos) y uno más que podría llegar antes de fin de año. Pero la base son esos jóvenes de casa (juventud del país) que se han formado bien, que están identificados con los valores del club (the country) within the principles of work and effort, nothing comes for free, or as it is said in football, the shirts do not win titles.

is alarming brain drain that has occurred in recent years in Venezuela. Hundreds and hundreds of talented young people leaving the country to seek greener pastures in foreign lands. Why? Who in theory should create opportunities for a better future have been devoted to defy anyone who is not submissive. The result? Taking home the talent to make a country better, personal matter to move to our own. Is it more sad? Imported staff (purchase indiscriminate) No has even remotely the preparation of our own, and as an aggravating factor, not identified with the country: they are mercenaries who, in many cases, use the country as a springboard to go to places where they can get what they want.

between the two models, a rather simplistic way, I have shown: With what we were? Are we allowing payment of an alleged "ideology" take the country to our most valuable asset, bleeding financially, while "importing" mercenaries and scabs? Or do we face in order to show that Venezuela, that is, its people, wants to be a big country and the real ground opportunities for their own and who love, really, to make it even better?

depends on us.

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

What To Put In A Baby Card

Do you use taxis? Some suggestions.

I just found out what happened to tocayísimo Luisa arrechera feel and at the same time, impotence is enormous. How long are these things going on here? I mean, not that other parties do not happen, but here, especially in Caracas, are the daily bread. Every day you learn that an acquaintance, relative, acquaintance of a relative, acquaintance of an acquaintance has been a victim of the underworld on four wheels.
I do not know in what circumstances tocayísimo took the taxi. But I'm going to let make some suggestions, something that I know, because for many years I have driven a taxi.
  1. Avoid taxis that are circulating (which used to call "ruletero").

  2. Unless an emergency and have no other choice, never take a taxi that is flowing down the street that has the dark glasses (especially the front windscreen think that is very fashionable).

  3. Of course there are criminals of all ages but, if they have no choice but to take a taxi that is in motion, try to see the face of the driver and prefer a taxi driver of a certain age: no less risk and, incidentally, are often more sympathetic to the rates. Try

  4. ride in taxis line. Try

  5. the location, in areas where they operate daily, taxi ranks, shopping centers, points of major lines, lines of Suburbia. Using these lines with some frequency, you get to build trust with the conductors and reduces the risk of unpleasant situations.

  6. If you are going to take a taxi at night, never stop them on the street, it is best to ask a caller to a recognized line: it is more expensive, certainly, but insurance. And in case any problems, you can always claim the line: they are (with certain limitations, of course) responsible for the acts of its partners.
Here are some suggestions that I would do to you, my friends. I've been lucky in who knows how many years I have mobilized in taxis never had an accident as that which took Louis, so I would make these suggestions: I have always followed to the letter.
I know that in the case of Luis arrive late, as we often happens in many things: they warn us when something has happened, but I hope they are good for those who have not had the misfortune of being in such a terrible situation.
In all, a hug, luck and a lot of attention!

Monday, August 24, 2009

Where Can You Get A Large Cargo Net For Climbing

Right or Left Channels Stos

I'm looking quite preoccupations on that well-educated people, politically speaking, to a speech apparently from left, are reacting in a very visceral and irrational and in the worst terms of the traditional right. All this said for respecting the right to freedom of thought of each.
I mean, if someone believes we have a leftist government, better check your books and political theories will bring little surprise that, although his "speeches" appear from left, his actions are more radical right, Fascism and National Socialism.
I repeat: I note with great concern that many people making much more radical opposition is so irrationally and that starts to sound too much like government people. It should be distinguished in the discourse as in execution.
Our problem is not left or right: everyone, as I said before, has the right to settle where he pleases, always from a rational perspective, our problem is, basically, knowledge and law enforcement . We can not go against the Constitution simply because our adversary does. She gives us resources to oppose, resist and defeat anyone who, from power, viola permanently. Already
electorally defeated, and it was shown that surveillance in the polls can not bend the will expressed by the voters. That is the way, anything else is just a shortcut and a shortcut that leads to something worse. Yes, you can always be worse.
In any case, and in preparation for the plebiscite, the Constitution gives us a resource, a resource used within the law is strong, unstoppable: Article 350.
Are we to think of it and act accordingly?