sure more than a wonder the relationship between two football clubs and a country, our country. Perhaps my reasoning a bit simplistic, but as it goes.
All my friends know I am a lifelong asshole and proud. And that implies a certain amount of anti-Real Madrid. In this note, this is not the case, as relevant here is the comparison of two management: talent trained at home and home versus buying indiscriminately.
begin by the second and a question: apart from isolated successes, can maintain over time an organization that depends only on values \u200b\u200bacquired at the point of checkbook without deep identification with the club (the country)? Having seen, the answer is obvious. Real have been great when your project has been based more on the national product in procurement. Now, if the project is selling T-shirts and sporting success (development project) is added, well, there are no comparison. Today, while having a large pool (youth of the country) prefer to buy the development of it, denying it the opportunity to grow and succeed at home (the country) and has only become currency (brain drain) to purchase that may or may not give success.
Barca, for many years, has a game model, style (national project), based primarily on talent homemade (youth). The boys who come to the farmhouse they were pampered, given formal education opportunities, are encouraged to continue to grow and develop, not only as players (professionals), but also as human beings. Come the time, the most talented and workers come to the first team (merits): with varying degrees of success (in life nothing is guaranteed) work to achieve metas, basados en el talento propio y en un diseño establecido pero no rígido: éste varía más o menos según las circunstancias (adaptación al medio).
En los últimos doce meses hemos visto cómo ese sistema ha dado unos frutos que, para muchos, eran impensables. Los jugadores hechos en casa, junto a las adquisiciones que eran necesarias para cubrir las carencias (importación de insumos no producidos en el país) han logrado éxitos sin precedentes: cinco títulos (proyectos exitosos) y uno más que podría llegar antes de fin de año. Pero la base son esos jóvenes de casa (juventud del país) que se han formado bien, que están identificados con los valores del club (the country) within the principles of work and effort, nothing comes for free, or as it is said in football, the shirts do not win titles.
is alarming brain drain that has occurred in recent years in Venezuela. Hundreds and hundreds of talented young people leaving the country to seek greener pastures in foreign lands. Why? Who in theory should create opportunities for a better future have been devoted to defy anyone who is not submissive. The result? Taking home the talent to make a country better, personal matter to move to our own. Is it more sad? Imported staff (purchase indiscriminate) No has even remotely the preparation of our own, and as an aggravating factor, not identified with the country: they are mercenaries who, in many cases, use the country as a springboard to go to places where they can get what they want.
between the two models, a rather simplistic way, I have shown: With what we were? Are we allowing payment of an alleged "ideology" take the country to our most valuable asset, bleeding financially, while "importing" mercenaries and scabs? Or do we face in order to show that Venezuela, that is, its people, wants to be a big country and the real ground opportunities for their own and who love, really, to make it even better?
depends on us.
All my friends know I am a lifelong asshole and proud. And that implies a certain amount of anti-Real Madrid. In this note, this is not the case, as relevant here is the comparison of two management: talent trained at home and home versus buying indiscriminately.
begin by the second and a question: apart from isolated successes, can maintain over time an organization that depends only on values \u200b\u200bacquired at the point of checkbook without deep identification with the club (the country)? Having seen, the answer is obvious. Real have been great when your project has been based more on the national product in procurement. Now, if the project is selling T-shirts and sporting success (development project) is added, well, there are no comparison. Today, while having a large pool (youth of the country) prefer to buy the development of it, denying it the opportunity to grow and succeed at home (the country) and has only become currency (brain drain) to purchase that may or may not give success.
Barca, for many years, has a game model, style (national project), based primarily on talent homemade (youth). The boys who come to the farmhouse they were pampered, given formal education opportunities, are encouraged to continue to grow and develop, not only as players (professionals), but also as human beings. Come the time, the most talented and workers come to the first team (merits): with varying degrees of success (in life nothing is guaranteed) work to achieve metas, basados en el talento propio y en un diseño establecido pero no rígido: éste varía más o menos según las circunstancias (adaptación al medio).
En los últimos doce meses hemos visto cómo ese sistema ha dado unos frutos que, para muchos, eran impensables. Los jugadores hechos en casa, junto a las adquisiciones que eran necesarias para cubrir las carencias (importación de insumos no producidos en el país) han logrado éxitos sin precedentes: cinco títulos (proyectos exitosos) y uno más que podría llegar antes de fin de año. Pero la base son esos jóvenes de casa (juventud del país) que se han formado bien, que están identificados con los valores del club (the country) within the principles of work and effort, nothing comes for free, or as it is said in football, the shirts do not win titles.
is alarming brain drain that has occurred in recent years in Venezuela. Hundreds and hundreds of talented young people leaving the country to seek greener pastures in foreign lands. Why? Who in theory should create opportunities for a better future have been devoted to defy anyone who is not submissive. The result? Taking home the talent to make a country better, personal matter to move to our own. Is it more sad? Imported staff (purchase indiscriminate) No has even remotely the preparation of our own, and as an aggravating factor, not identified with the country: they are mercenaries who, in many cases, use the country as a springboard to go to places where they can get what they want.
between the two models, a rather simplistic way, I have shown: With what we were? Are we allowing payment of an alleged "ideology" take the country to our most valuable asset, bleeding financially, while "importing" mercenaries and scabs? Or do we face in order to show that Venezuela, that is, its people, wants to be a big country and the real ground opportunities for their own and who love, really, to make it even better?
depends on us.
0 comments:
Post a Comment